All AOC OIG Recommendations are posted on Oversight.gov.
Evaluation of the Architect of the Capitol’s Security Badging Program
We recommend the Office of the Chief Security Officer develop and implement a suitability policy for AOC employees and consolidate and implement revisions, as appropriate, to the current contractor suitability policy. Additionally, develop and implement a standardized timeline for policy revision and update within the current Fiscal Year.
Evaluation of the Information Technology Division’s Inventory Accountability and Controls
The Chief Information Officer continue pursuit of transitioning to a single asset management system that addresses its program needs to track accountable and consumable IT property and establish a detailed implementation plan with target dates to transition to a single asset management system for accountable and consumable IT property as currently captured in Cireson and Jumpstock.
Follow-Up Evaluation of the Congressional Request for Architect of the Capitol’s Response to Sexual Harassment
We recommend that the Diversity, Inclusion and Dispute Resolution Office (DI/DR) perform a climate assessment for jurisdictions that frequently work with the public to identify and address concerns regarding nonemployee harassment and hostile work environments.
We recommend that the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) document and implement a process to conduct follow up inquiries after resolution to identify employee concerns, verify safety, address fears of retaliation and ensure effective reintegration (as appropriate) to minimize negative impacts on its workforce.
We recommend that the Architect of the Capitol (AOC) update AOC Order 24-1 Conciliation Program Guide, May 22, 2013, to ensure it is providing consistent and current information about the conciliation process and resources available.
Audit of the Cannon House Office Building Renewal Project's Substantial & Final Completion for Phase 3 & Phase 4
We recommend that the Architect of the Capitol develop construction contract requirements and project specifications for substantial and final completion that are feasible, achievable and necessary for future construction projects with multiple phases — similar to the Cannon House Office Building Renewal Project.
Audit of the Architect of the Capitol’s Senate Furniture Program
Revise and implement policies, procedures and automated and/or manual processes to align with applicable federal guidance and regulations; comply with GAO’s government internal control standards; enhance asset management and operational efficiency; improve data accuracy and reporting capabilities; and ensure the consistent application of asset management practices.
Maintain documentation that supports the lifecycle of its assets.
Conduct a complete (“book to floor and floor to book”) 100 percent physical inventory and correct the inventory records as appropriate, to include a review of reported costs.
Establish and implement asset management training on how to properly acquire, safeguard, transfer, label and dispose of assets; store assets and maintain inventory levels; record an asset and create/use reports; and apply cost-effective and economical asset management techniques.
Reassess the amount and condition of leased storage space needed to support current program operations and reduce waste.
Evaluation of the Architect of the Capitol’s Implementation of Information Security Modernization for Fiscal Year 2024
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
The OIG has determined that the contents of this recommendation would not be appropriate for public disclosure and has therefore limited its distribution to selected officials.
Audit of the CHOBr Project's Contract Labor
We recommend that the Architect of the
Capitol’s contracting officials use
contractual remedies to ensure
compliance with the Examination of
Records clause
Evaluation of Architect of the Capitol's Supply Chain Risk Management
Recommendation 1a
We recommend the Architect of the Capitol perform an independent risk assessment to identify
and evaluate potential risks within the agency’s supply chain, including risks related to cybersecurity, geopolitical factors, vendor reliability, and compliance with regulatory requirements. This assessment will allow the agency to determine whether a formal Supply Chain Risk Management program is necessary based on the agency’s unique risk profile.
Recommendation 1b
If deemed necessary based on the outcomes of the assessment performed, develop and
implement a Supply Chain Risk Management program tailored to the identified risks. This may
include implementing or enhancing appropriate controls, vendor risk management processes,
continuous monitoring, and integration of risk considerations into procurement and operation
decision-making.Recommendation 2
We recommend that the agency work with the offices and jurisdictions to define, document, and
implement risk management processes for offices and jurisdictions to consistently identify, track,
and manage risks applicable to them.Recommendation 3
We recommend that the agency work with the offices and jurisdictions to develop and document
risk tolerance thresholds for strategic objectives.